Legal

 

This case has since taken on a whole new meaning for me. I am forced to fight for my good name as well as work to make sure there is no hint that I am cooperating in any way with any law enforcement officials.

I have extensive experience with the tactics of litigating cases, and I have successfully represented myself in both criminal and civil actions in multiple jurisdictions, including: Indiana, Massachusetts, Nevada and New Hampshire. I also brought matters before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals related to an Indiana case where I was named in an injunction (to prevent me from writing a book about the defendant) but not as a party to the case.

I know there are fundamental problems and fatal flaws with this case at hand, and I will set about exposing these during the March 21st hearing. The most prevalent of issues is a clear violation of my 4th and 14th Amendment rights and a host of issues that illustrated to me that my arrest was never meant to be permanent. I was expected to immediately cooperate, but I thankfully did not in light of what I've learned since. Once I cooperated the arrest would have likely been made to look like it never even happened. I have yet to be given any formal documents listing my exact charges, as if it REALLY NEVER HAPPENED anyway. The bail bondsman had more information on my case than I had, and he wasn't even under arrest for the crime, or made to believe he was.

I would appreciate your urgent attention in providing the following original materials, or official true and correct copies of these materials. This shall be considered a formal request for discovery, and I can pick everything up at your office on Monday if everything can be compiled by then.

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). This bedrock principle of the criminal justice system forms the basis of a prosecutor's obligation to inform criminal defendants of any exculpatory and/or impeachment evidence which relates to their case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that is favorable to the accused. This includes evidence that is material to the guilt, innocence, or punishment of the accused or that may impact the credibility of a government witness, including a police officer. It is paramount that this obligation is scrupulously complied with in order to maintain the public's confidence in the criminal justice system.  

I am attaching a recording of a phone call I had with the two co-CEOs of Xyience, Incorporated from my first legal adventure in Las Vegas. These two highly educated individuals were put in place to purposely bankrupt the company on behalf of the billionaire Fertittta family. I was the only one trying to stop their giant, sophisticated con job at the time. They were suing me for $25 million for defaming the company even while these two monkeys were going to my site to figure out the company's actual history.

Bankrupting Xyience would be the practice run for their bankrupting of an entire casino chain. If Donald Trump just "took advantage of" the federal bankruptcy law, the Ferrites raped those laws to get where they are today. 

I spent over 6 years on the Xyience case. I cultivated inside sources at the company who gave me my most damning evidence of the corruption. I even called into a conference call once where the opening topic of conversation was a company-wide email I sent out from outside their system.

I do not have so much as a parking ticket in this state on my criminal record and not a whisper of any drug crimes in Massachusetts or anything significant from my years in Massachusetts. When the police play their games and are allowed to lie and set people up, they must use a qualified player in the system to play those games with. They can't literally find a random guy on the side of the road stuck in a uhaul truck in a snowstorm. No more than the Red Sox can find a bum in a cardboard box on Yawkey Way and dress him for a game that night to play first base.